Step1: Research Planning & Funding

For general questions about planning and funding resources, or to request additional support, please contact:
- Rose Williams
- 1 (804) 828-5853
- williamsrm4@vcu.edu
Every strong study starts with a solid plan. Wright Center resources are available to support the planning, development, and submission of competitive grant and funding proposals at VCU.
These resources are intended as a starting point and are not comprehensive. Investigators are encouraged to explore the linked pages and institutional sites for additional tools, training, and guidance tailored to their research needs. If you have any resources to add, please email cctr.vcu.edu.
All resource titles appear as red links and include a brief description and access information (if applicable). Click an accordion below to explore available tools and resources
Research Exploration & Feasibility
|
Resource Name |
Resource Description |
|
Epic Cosmos provides a secure, self-service platform for accessing a vast de-identified clinical dataset from Epic electronic health records across multiple institutions. It allows researchers to safely perform data extraction and analysis in a sandbox environment, ensuring privacy while expanding the pool of research subjects. By offering improved access to diverse populations and encouraging the use of de-identified data, Epic Cosmos helps enhance the scope and inclusivity of your research, providing broader insights and opportunities beyond local patient groups. |
|
|
|
|
|
ENACT (Evolve to Next-Gen ACT) formally ACT Network |
ENACT (Evolve to Next-Gen ACT) is a clinical data platform developed as the next-generation evolution of the ACT (Accrual to Clinical Trials) Network. It enables researchers to assess patient availability and study feasibility across a national network of participating health systems by providing real-time access to de-identified electronic health record (EHR) data. |
|
|
|
|
HealthLandscape Virginia is an interactive mapping tool that enables researchers to visualize population health indicators and explore the geographic distribution of patient populations across Virginia. |
|
|
Data USA is a free, open-source platform that provides comprehensive, easy-to-use visualizations of U.S. public data. It integrates data from sources like the U.S. Census Bureau, Bureau of Labor Statistics, and Department of Education to help researchers: |
|
|
Data.gov is the U.S. government's open data portal, offering access to over 250,000 datasets from federal agencies. It supports transparency, innovation, and research by providing free, public access to data across a wide range of domains, including: |
|
|
ICPSR (Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research) |
ICPSR is one of the world’s largest archives of social and behavioral science data, hosted by the University of Michigan. It provides access to curated datasets for research and instruction in fields such as: |
|
|||||||||||||||
|
Resource Name |
Resource Description |
|
|
Explore VCU Research (EVR) is a searchable, public-facing platform that showcases the research expertise, scholarly output, and collaborations of VCU faculty. It is part of the RAMS (Research Administration Management System) suite and is designed to: |
|
|
|
VCU Libraries is a vital resource for faculty, offering access to a vast array of scholarly materials, expert research support, and innovative tools to advance academic work. Beyond providing books and databases, the library plays a strategic role in helping researchers identify knowledge gaps and shape impactful studies. |
|
|
|
This VCU library resource covers: |
|
|
|
Literature search for research planning and identification of research problem |
The article highlights the critical role of a structured literature search in developing research questions and planning studies. It explains that literature reviews are essential for assessing existing evidence, identifying gaps in knowledge, and shaping research hypotheses. |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Funding: Grant
|
Resource Name |
Resource Description |
|
This fact sheet created by Ohio State University offers a general, funder-agnostic overview of the grant writing process, making it a useful complement to NIH-specific guidance for investigators pursuing foundation, local, or non-federal funding. It frames grant writing as roughly 80% planning and 20% writing, stressing that a clear mission, program goals, activities plan, staffing, timeline, budget, and outcome measures should be established before searching for and approaching funders. The guide also walks through practical steps such as vetting whether grant funding is truly the right approach, researching and building relationships with funders, crafting a concise project pitch, and carefully following each funder's specific guidelines, formatting rules, and attachment requirements. |
|
| Grants.gov |
The Grants Learning Center provides structured guidance and educational materials on the full federal grant lifecycle, including “Grants 101,” eligibility, policies and regulations, key terminology, grant-making agencies, and common grant systems. It also offers grant-writing tips, tutorials, applicant training videos, FAQs, and information on reporting, monitoring, and avoiding grant fraud, making it a useful starting point for investigators who are new to federal funding or want to strengthen their proposal development skills. |
|
This 37-minute video, part of the NIH Virtual Grants Conference, provides a comprehensive introduction to the NIH grants process. It covers where to begin, how to find funding opportunities, and what tools and resources are essential for success. Topics include types of NIH grant programs, the application and submission process, post-review and award procedures, and post-award monitoring. The session is ideal for early-career researchers and administrators seeking to understand the full lifecycle of NIH funding. |
|
|
The NIH Grants Process page provides a comprehensive overview of each step involved in securing and managing NIH grants, from planning and application to award and post-award reporting. Key stages include preparing to apply, writing and submitting the application, peer review, award decisions, and ensuring compliance through post-award reporting. |
|
|
NIH Grants Process: A Brief Walk-Through for Beginners" provides an introduction to the NIH grants process, covering essential steps from identifying funding opportunities to managing awards. It is designed to guide new applicants through the NIH's procedures and requirements, making it easier to navigate the complexities of grant applications. |
|
Resource Name |
Resource Description |
|
This webinar is designed to help researchers identify the right funding opportunities for their projects. The session provides valuable guidance on how to search for and evaluate different funding sources, such as government agencies, private foundations, and industry partners. It covers how to match your research goals with the right funding programs, giving researchers the tools to focus their efforts on grants that are most likely to align with their expertise and project scope. The webinar also offers tips for staying updated on new funding opportunities, helping researchers navigate the often overwhelming landscape of available grants. |
|
|
VCU Office of the Vice President for Research and Innovation – Funding Opportunities |
- Central hub for identifying both internal and external research funding opportunities at VCU |
|
A comprehensive, searchable database of external funding opportunities across all disciplines — federal, foundation, corporate, and international sponsors. Users can create profiles, save and track searches, and receive alerts for relevant grants, awards, and fellowships.
|
|
| Simpler.Grants.gov
|
Simpler.Grants.gov provides an improved, user-friendly way to search Grants.gov for federal funding opportunities across agencies, using enhanced keyword search, filters, and redesigned results to help investigators quickly identify relevant opportunities. Users can explore active, forecasted, and archived opportunities and then link directly to Grants.gov to begin the application process. |
Grant Application
|
Resource Name |
Resource Description |
| Wright Center Research Design Studio (review service) |
- Provides a facilitated, multidisciplinary consultation during the early-to-mid stages of grant development, bringing together mentors, subject-matter experts, and Wright Center staff (biostatistics, clinical research, informatics, community engagement) to review a project. - Specifically addresses refinement of specific aims and measurable outcomes, along with hypothesis development, study design, recruitment feasibility, and data analysis planning. - Offered at no cost; participants receive collaborative expert feedback, a written summary of recommendations, and a recording of the session. - Best suited for investigators with an identified grant mechanism and a submission deadline roughly six months out; requests should be submitted 4-6 weeks in advance and should include a draft specific aims page, description of feedback needed, and suggested expert reviewers. - Not intended for submission-ready applications (see Mock Study Section instead) or for purely statistical/methodological questions (see Biostatistics Consultation instead). |
| NIH Advice on Specific Aims Section |
- Provides official NIH guidance on crafting the Specific Aims attachment within the Research Plan. - Explains how aims should summarize hypothesis-driven goals and expected outcomes and collectively answer the central scientific question. - Emphasizes drafting aims early, seeking mentor feedback, focusing on goals and impact rather than listing experiments, and proposing a feasible set of related aims for the project period. |
| NIH All About Grants Podcast: Considerations for a Research Plan |
- NIH program officers discuss writing effective Specific Aims and Research Strategy sections for R01, R03, and R21 applications. - Distinguishes Specific Aims (a one-page summary that "sells your science") from Research Strategy (the full rationale and experimental plan) and recommends drafting Aims first. - Describes a strong Aims page as a cohesive scientific story with interrelated (not interdependent) aims, not a list of experiments. - Notes the Aims page is the most widely-read section and is often shared across NIH program staff. - Flags common pitfalls: omitting key prior work, underexplaining data analysis/interpretation, and assuming significance is self-evident. - Encourages reaching out to NIH program officers early when developing aims. |
| R01 Countdown: Tools for Writing Concise and Compelling Grants |
- Provides handouts that identify eight recommended elements for writing concise and compelling Specific Aims pages. - Includes annotated examples and color-coded templates to help investigators verify that key elements (clinical and scientific significance, innovation, hypotheses, preliminary data, and expected impact) are present. - Designed as a practical tool for investigators, mentors, and faculty development programs to support aims-page drafting and internal review. |
| VCU OVPRI Research Development Services (RDS) |
OVPRI's Research Development Team supports investigators across the full grant life cycle, from refining early project ideas and identifying funding opportunities to building collaborative teams and developing competitive proposals. The team assists with narrative sections such as Specific Aims and Research Strategy, including interpreting funder guidelines, drafting language, and editing proposal drafts, and encourages investigators to reach out early so aims pages can be strengthened before internal and external review. How to access: |
| Note: For general grant writing tips, formatting guidance, and full proposal development resources, see Drafting & Reviewing Your Full Application below. | |
| Grant Writing Academy |
Grant Writing Academy provides hands-on training and expert guidance to improve grant writing skills and increase proposal success rates. Grant Academy is offered twice per year. Each cohort will consist of 12-15 faculty participants. Applicants need to be available to consistently attend all cohort workshop sessions. |
| The OVPRI (Office of the Vice President for Research and Innovation) Proposal Writing Guide is a comprehensive resource that provides step-by-step instructions on how to write successful proposals. This guide often includes advice on structuring a proposal, crafting a compelling narrative, developing a research plan, and preparing a realistic budget. It also offers tips on common mistakes to avoid and how to effectively communicate the significance of the research. Researchers can use this guide as a roadmap when preparing their grant applications, ensuring that they meet the specific requirements of funding agencies and maximize their chances of success. | |
| The OVPRI Funded Proposal Samples are real-world examples of successful proposals that have received funding. These samples provide researchers with concrete templates and models to follow when writing their own proposals. By studying these examples, researchers can gain insight into what makes a proposal successful—such as how to structure the research narrative, present the methodology, and communicate the significance of the research. These samples also illustrate how to properly format a proposal and respond to funding agency guidelines. They serve as a valuable reference for researchers looking to emulate successful strategies in their own grant applications. | |
| The Wright Center for Clinical and Translational Research hosts NIH-style Mock Study Sections which are designed to closely mimic an actual NIH study section. These review sessions for clinical and translational R and K series are aligned with the three NIH grants cycles. The goals of this program are to provide (1) a critical review and targeted, comprehensive feedback to applications on their complete grant application and (2) increase the likelihood of grant funding success of submitted (or resubmitted) grant applications by junior faculty. Eligibility Wright Center Mock Study Section is available to: -Current Wright SKolar CommuniTy members [priority] -Collaborating junior faculty (e.g. previous KL2 applicants, and junior faculty linked to WCCTR) Request Please upload the following documents: -Hypothesis/Specific Aims of the proposed grant (1-page) (helps committee identify and gather potential reviewers) -Mentee and Primary Mentor Agreement (acknowledges deadlines and requirements) AND Primary Mentor Review Form (acknowledges review of grant components prior to submission) |
|
|
The Wright Center offers a recurring series of virtual grant seminars in which faculty experts discuss and answer questions about National Institutes of Health, National Science Foundation, Department of Defense, and other federal grant mechanisms. Topics include responding to grant critiques, incorporating rigor and reproducibility into NIH applications, and other key components of competitive grant writing and resubmission strategies. To learn about upcoming Kaltura grant writing sessions, visit the Wright Center’s events calendar and to the Wright Center’s newsletter for updates. VCU Log-in required |
|
|
Budget and Financial Tools: |
|
|
SciENcv is a free, NIH-required online tool for creating and certifying biosketches for NIH, NSF, and other federal grant applications. It auto-populates fields like education, employment, and publications (often pulling from ORCID or eRA Commons), standardizing the biosketch format and reducing duplication of effort across applications. |
|
Resource Name |
Resource Description |
|
Note: At VCU, all principal investigators must submit their proposals in RAMS‑SPOT for internal review and routing, and all finalized proposals are submitted to sponsors by the Division of Sponsored Programs (DSP). This diagram provides a high-level overview of the full sponsored program life cycle at VCU, from initial idea development and proposal preparation through submission, award setup, project management, and closeout. It helps investigators and research administrators see how proposal development, budgeting, compliance, and post‑award activities fit together within VCU’s processes and offices. |
|
|
The Proposals & Awards site is VCU’s central hub for preparing, routing, submitting, and managing sponsored grant and contract applications. - Outlines the full sponsored project lifecycle (pre‑proposal, proposal, pre‑award, award, and post‑award) and how each phase is handled at VCU. - Links to the Sponsored Project Navigator, which provides step‑by‑step guidance for assembling and submitting proposals through VCU, including RAMS‑SPOT routing and internal review. - Provides access to required institutional forms and templates (e.g., budget templates, PI eligibility forms, subrecipient commitment forms, biosketch templates, and other standard documents). - Clarifies roles and responsibilities for PIs, departmental research administrators, and central offices in the proposal and award process. - Highlights internal proposal submission deadlines, routing expectations, and review timelines to support timely and compliant sponsor submissions. - Offers policy and compliance guidance related to sponsored projects, helping investigators align applications with university, sponsor, and federal requirements. Note: At VCU, all principal investigators must submit their proposals in RAMS‑SPOT for internal review and routing, and all finalized proposals are submitted to sponsors by the Division of Sponsored Programs (DSP). |
|
|
This one-page workflow diagram illustrates the proposal submission process in RAMS‑SPOT and clarifies who is responsible for each step, from initiating the funding proposal through school/department review to Division of Sponsored Programs (DSP) submission to the sponsor. It is a quick visual reference for PIs and research administrators to understand roles, routing order, and key handoffs during proposal submission. |
|
|
The Sponsored Project Navigator is an online map of VCU’s sponsored project processes, organized by phase (pre‑proposal, proposal, pre‑award, award, and post‑award). It helps investigators and research staff quickly find the specific guidance, forms, and contacts they need based on what they are working on—whether they are preparing a new funding proposal in RAMS‑SPOT, negotiating an award, or managing post‑award changes. - Organizes VCU’s sponsored project information by lifecycle phase (pre‑proposal, proposal, pre‑award, award, and post‑award). - Helps investigators and research administrators locate phase‑specific guidance, required forms, and key contacts. - Includes links to RAMS‑SPOT workflows, submission diagrams, and policy pages to support compliant proposal submission and award management. |
|
|
VCU RAMS SPOT Getting Started – Administrative Actions Type Guide |
This PDF guide provides step-by-step instructions for initiating administrative actions in RAMS-SPOT, VCU’s Sponsored Programs Online Tracking system. It covers how to request changes such as budget revisions, no-cost extensions, and PI changes. The document includes annotated screenshots and navigation tips to help users efficiently manage post-submission administrative tasks. It is intended for VCU faculty and staff involved in sponsored project administration. |
Study Development
|
Resource Name |
Resource Description |
|
|
The Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Research Design (BERD) Core at the VCU Wright Center for Clinical and Translational Research provides expert statistical support to faculty and research teams across the university. Their services are designed to enhance the quality, rigor, and reproducibility of clinical and translational research. |
|
|
|
The Design Studio at the VCU Wright Center for Clinical and Translational Research offers investigators the opportunity to present their research ideas to a multidisciplinary panel of experts for constructive feedback. The goal is to strengthen study design, feasibility, and overall readiness for funding or IRB submission. Sessions bring together experienced investigators, biostatisticians, community engagement experts, and other specialists to provide diverse perspectives that improve scientific quality and impact. Services include: Feedback on research aims, hypotheses, and study design Guidance on feasibility and participant recruitment strategies Input on data collection, analysis, and community engagement plans Support in aligning projects with funding or institutional priorities Recommendations for additional Wright Center resources and collaborations Tip: Schedule a Design Studio early in the planning phase—ideally before submitting to the IRB or funding agency—to maximize the benefit of feedback. Access instructions: |
|
|
|
The Value of Early Collaborations with a Biostatistician: How Going Rogue Leads to Bad Science |
This 1-hour video emphasizes the importance of early collaborations with biostatisticians in research to avoid pitfalls that can lead to flawed scientific outcomes. It discusses common mistakes researchers make when acting independently, highlighting the need for statistical expertise in study design, data analysis, and interpretation. The talk advocates for integrating biostatistical guidance from the project's inception to enhance the quality and reliability of research findings. |
|
|
Webinar: Whetting Your Appetite For Research Series: Sample Size |
This 1-hour educational webinar, part of the Wright Center’s “Whetting Your Appetite for Research” series, is led by Dr. Leroy Thacker, a senior biostatistician at VCU. The session introduces foundational concepts in determining appropriate sample sizes for clinical and translational research. It covers why sample size matters, how it affects statistical power and study validity, and what factors influence sample size calculations. The webinar is ideal for investigators in the planning phase of a study who want to ensure their research is adequately powered and methodologically sound. |
|
|
Making Sense of Statistics" is a practical, plain-language guide that helps readers understand and critically evaluate statistical information. It breaks down essential statistical concepts—like averages, variability, sample size, and confidence intervals—while highlighting how statistics can be misused or misrepresented in public discourse, media, and research. |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Resource Name |
Resource Description |
|
|
- Provides expert support and access to data capture, management, and analysis tools including REDCap, statistical software, and data visualization resources |
|
|
|
-Explore data management systems early to design compliant and efficient data workflows |
|
|
|
Resource Name |
Resource Description |
|
|
These protocol templates are required for the submission of new research studies at VCU effective June 1, 2023. They are tailored to VCU’s IRB processes and must be used for all IRB submissions. |
|
|
|
The Biostatistics Consulting Laboratory (BCL) provides expert statistical guidance for researchers, focusing on study design, analysis, and interpretation of data. BCL consultants assist in drafting research protocols by advising on optimal statistical methods, sample size determination, and data analysis plans, ensuring that protocols are scientifically and statistically rigorous. This support helps ensure that research studies are properly designed to generate valid, reliable results. |
|
|
|
The Design Studio at the VCU Wright Center for Clinical and Translational Research offers investigators a collaborative opportunity to strengthen their study protocols before submission. Sessions bring together multidisciplinary experts who provide tailored feedback to enhance study design, feasibility, and overall scientific quality. Services include:
Tip: Schedule a Design Studio before finalizing your protocol to ensure methodological rigor and readiness for IRB or funding submission. Access instructions: |
|
|
|
University of California San Francisco Clinical Trial Protocol Development |
The UCSF Clinical Research Resource Hub offers resources for protocol development, including sample templates for various clinical trials. These templates help researchers meet regulatory and GCP standards. The protocols typically cover topics like study design, subject selection, efficacy assessment, adverse event reporting, and statistical considerations. UCSF also provides access to NIH protocol templates for specific research areas like interventional, behavioral, and retrospective studies. |
|
|
The University of Minnesota’s Clinical and Translational Science Institute (CTSI) emphasizes that strong research protocols should be complete, comprehensive, compliant, and consistent—the “Four C’s” of protocol development. These qualities ensure regulatory readiness and smooth study execution. CTSI also offers resources like the Clinical Research Support Center, Research Navigators, and an Investigator Manual to guide researchers through the development process. |
|
|
|
Note that VCU OVPRI has required protocol templates here: https://research.vcu.edu/forms/ This tool is optional and supplemental—not a substitute for VCU’s required templates. |
|
|
|
Resource Name |
Resource Description |
|
|
This tool integrates with VCU Health’s Epic system to support point-of-care recruitment for clinical research. With IRB approval, inclusion/exclusion criteria are embedded into Epic, allowing the system to identify potentially eligible patients during clinical visits. When a match is found, a secure message is sent to the research team or clinician, who can then approach the patient about study participation.
|
|
|
|
ResearchMatch is a free, online, national volunteer registry that connects volunteers interested in health-related research with researchers seeking participants. It allows researchers to search for and directly message eligible volunteers, expanding access to a diverse and geographically distributed participant pool. ResearchMatch supports both feasibility assessment and active recruitment by: - Serving as a national, disease-neutral registry that matches interested individuals with appropriate health-related research studies. - Providing a feasibility-only access option that does not require IRB approval, allowing teams to view aggregate registry data, estimate the number and characteristics of potentially eligible volunteers, and gauge study interest. - Offering the , an NIH-supported, no-cost service that uses brief REDCap surveys to collect structured feedback from volunteers (or proxy participants) on planned studies, such as protocol burden, visit schedules, and recruitment materials, with analysis and actionable recommendations provided by the Recruitment Innovation Center. - Supporting IRB-approved active recruitment, in which researchers with an approved protocol and IRB-approved recruitment language can send secure messages to eligible volunteers, extending recruitment beyond local clinics and institutions. - Helping teams refine recruitment messaging, incentives, and study design based on participant perspectives, which can strengthen both recruitment and retention plans. - Additional guidance for investigators is available through the ResearchMatch.org – National Registry Project from the Recuitment Innovation Center, a researcher one-pager, tips for creating effective contact messages, researcher FAQs, and a “How to Use ResearchMatch” toolkit document, along with contact information for ResearchMatch support. |
|
|
|
VCU Telegram |
|
|
For regulatory and IRB guidance, see the Study Start-up/Setup phase page.




